Hukuman adalah berdasarkan kes yang dilakukan. Tidak ada kes yang sama. Katakan orang bunuh, didakwa di mahkamah atas tuduhan membunuh, dia tertikam sekali saja, dan mati. Tetapi sebaliknya kalau ada mengatakan orang itu ada keterangan yang bunuh atau tikam 20 kali, jadi hukuman itu kalaulah setahun, kawan ni yang tikam 19, 20 kali tikam itu, kena tujuh atau lapan tahun. Link
Bad example! That is the way that our stupid politicians think. As simple as that, if you are a murder, you are a murder.
Pages
▼
Friday, March 20, 2009
Thursday, March 05, 2009
Jokes from Ahmad Said (Updated)
Issue of his son bringing child pornographic material into Australia:
“I can bet with you that it’s something that you will find on most men’s handphones”
“Why are they targeting me? I did nothing over there. It’s like committing a traffic offence here and paying the summons – and then the father gets blamed for it. Is that fair? It’s brainless”
Issue of Perak Speaker:
“The Speaker is deemed as an officer of the civil service and can be investigated for abuse of power”
Issue on Money Politics in Umno:
"Setakat ini, kita (SPRM) tidak jumpa apa-apa kesalahan (berkaitan politik wang) dan oleh itu, kita anggap tiada kes"
Interview with TheStar on PR MB and not Barisan MB been charged:
It was because there was a report against those Mentris Besar. Report-lah on the other (Barisan) MBs if they have committed corruption. It’s not like MBs cannot be charged. Report if you have the evidence and let us charge him.
Interview with TheStar on Khir Toyo:
He was cleared. There was no evidence against him. This was a long ago, not during my time. As for the reports lodged against him yesterday, those are actually the same old reports being repeated. Those cases have already been closed. If the evidence given is the same as before, there is no reason for us to re-open the case. We can re-open the case only if they produce new evidence.
And a lot of nonsenses from him...... just click here
“I can bet with you that it’s something that you will find on most men’s handphones”
“Why are they targeting me? I did nothing over there. It’s like committing a traffic offence here and paying the summons – and then the father gets blamed for it. Is that fair? It’s brainless”
Issue of Perak Speaker:
“The Speaker is deemed as an officer of the civil service and can be investigated for abuse of power”
Issue on Money Politics in Umno:
"Setakat ini, kita (SPRM) tidak jumpa apa-apa kesalahan (berkaitan politik wang) dan oleh itu, kita anggap tiada kes"
Interview with TheStar on PR MB and not Barisan MB been charged:
It was because there was a report against those Mentris Besar. Report-lah on the other (Barisan) MBs if they have committed corruption. It’s not like MBs cannot be charged. Report if you have the evidence and let us charge him.
Interview with TheStar on Khir Toyo:
He was cleared. There was no evidence against him. This was a long ago, not during my time. As for the reports lodged against him yesterday, those are actually the same old reports being repeated. Those cases have already been closed. If the evidence given is the same as before, there is no reason for us to re-open the case. We can re-open the case only if they produce new evidence.
And a lot of nonsenses from him...... just click here
Wednesday, March 04, 2009
Syabas!
Tan Sri Rozali Ismail, the chairman of Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor (Syabas) and Puncak Niaga Sdn Bhd, said today the RM5.1 million salary paid to him in 2007 for running the companies was justified.
“If you want professionals to run your company, you have to pay professional fees.”
Are you satisfied with your quality of water in your home? How many of us are forced to buy the filter because the water supplied to us is in unbearable stage? What does he contribute to us in terms of our quality of lives? Why should we pay him such a big sum of money with no return? If your product is water and you are not able to provide it in good quality, then you are failed and unjustified.
“If you want professionals to run your company, you have to pay professional fees.”
Are you satisfied with your quality of water in your home? How many of us are forced to buy the filter because the water supplied to us is in unbearable stage? What does he contribute to us in terms of our quality of lives? Why should we pay him such a big sum of money with no return? If your product is water and you are not able to provide it in good quality, then you are failed and unjustified.
Tuesday, March 03, 2009
Sultan and Raja, don't Let us Down Again!
It must be appreciated that the events unfolding in Perak are unprecedented and involve complex legal issues. It is impossible to provide a conclusive opinion on them. Some matters may, however, be addressed generally as a matter of principle.
Today 27 Assemblymen in Perak were prevented by the OCPD from entering the State Secretariat building, apparently upon “instructions” from the State Assembly Secretary.
The role of the State Assembly Secretary now comes under scrutiny. He is an official appointed from the public services and is only responsible for the administrative management of the State. He therefore has no authority to decide or pronounce whether a legislative assembly sitting is valid or not. The police have therefore acted improperly on his advice in defiance of the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly. These errors are further compounded by events that transpired in the High Court.
It was asserted before the Court by the plaintiff’s lawyers that the Speaker ought to be represented by the State Legal Advisor rather than private lawyers. There is certainly legal basis to disagree with that view but a more substantive matter of general principle must be addressed as to the position of the State Legal Advisor
Firstly, every lawyer must act on the instructions of his client and not otherwise. The Speaker has stated that he never gave instructions to the State Legal Advisor to either appear for him or to argue the case on his behalf. This is a matter that the Court must satisfy itself of before proceeding.
Secondly, the State Legal Advisor is clearly in a position of conflict. He and his department are presently acting for Dato’ Zambry in the Kuala Lumpur High Court suit where Dato’ Zambry’s appointment is being challenged. How can he or his department now act for the Speaker against Dato’ Zambry?
If the parties who file and defend proceedings in Court are confident of the strength of their case, there is little reason to taint or mar the proceedings with acts that militate against natural justice and fair play. It bears repeating that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done. The Courts have a duty to uphold the highest principles of justice, fairness and their own independence. We must respect the doctrine of separation of powers and uphold the Federal Constitution.
The Legislative Assembly was convened by the Speaker a short distance from the State Secretariat building. There are questions as to whether it was permissible to hold the Legislative Assembly outside the State Secretariat building. Of course, the State Secretariat building is where the Legislative Assembly ought to have been held. However, the Speaker and Assemblymen were prevented from holding it in the proper place by the police (and this raises serious issues as to the legality of the police action). Thus the Speaker had no choice but to act within what may be seen as wide powers to convene the meeting elsewhere. No doubt there will be contrary views but it must be understood that this situation is unprecedented and the Standing Orders may not adequately cover these eventualities, thus leaving the Speaker with the powers to act according to the circumstances of the case.
We will no doubt see another case filed in Court. And the public has to further suffer the consequences of uncertainty.
The situation is untenable and cries out for the one thing that will resolve it conclusively – fresh elections. There is now a window of opportunity for this to happen. Let the people decide.
Dato’ Ambiga Sreenevasan
President
Malaysian Bar
3 March 2009
Now. Sultan and Raja, please decide. Otherwise, just stop talking and giving speech.
Today 27 Assemblymen in Perak were prevented by the OCPD from entering the State Secretariat building, apparently upon “instructions” from the State Assembly Secretary.
The role of the State Assembly Secretary now comes under scrutiny. He is an official appointed from the public services and is only responsible for the administrative management of the State. He therefore has no authority to decide or pronounce whether a legislative assembly sitting is valid or not. The police have therefore acted improperly on his advice in defiance of the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly. These errors are further compounded by events that transpired in the High Court.
It was asserted before the Court by the plaintiff’s lawyers that the Speaker ought to be represented by the State Legal Advisor rather than private lawyers. There is certainly legal basis to disagree with that view but a more substantive matter of general principle must be addressed as to the position of the State Legal Advisor
Firstly, every lawyer must act on the instructions of his client and not otherwise. The Speaker has stated that he never gave instructions to the State Legal Advisor to either appear for him or to argue the case on his behalf. This is a matter that the Court must satisfy itself of before proceeding.
Secondly, the State Legal Advisor is clearly in a position of conflict. He and his department are presently acting for Dato’ Zambry in the Kuala Lumpur High Court suit where Dato’ Zambry’s appointment is being challenged. How can he or his department now act for the Speaker against Dato’ Zambry?
If the parties who file and defend proceedings in Court are confident of the strength of their case, there is little reason to taint or mar the proceedings with acts that militate against natural justice and fair play. It bears repeating that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done. The Courts have a duty to uphold the highest principles of justice, fairness and their own independence. We must respect the doctrine of separation of powers and uphold the Federal Constitution.
The Legislative Assembly was convened by the Speaker a short distance from the State Secretariat building. There are questions as to whether it was permissible to hold the Legislative Assembly outside the State Secretariat building. Of course, the State Secretariat building is where the Legislative Assembly ought to have been held. However, the Speaker and Assemblymen were prevented from holding it in the proper place by the police (and this raises serious issues as to the legality of the police action). Thus the Speaker had no choice but to act within what may be seen as wide powers to convene the meeting elsewhere. No doubt there will be contrary views but it must be understood that this situation is unprecedented and the Standing Orders may not adequately cover these eventualities, thus leaving the Speaker with the powers to act according to the circumstances of the case.
We will no doubt see another case filed in Court. And the public has to further suffer the consequences of uncertainty.
The situation is untenable and cries out for the one thing that will resolve it conclusively – fresh elections. There is now a window of opportunity for this to happen. Let the people decide.
Dato’ Ambiga Sreenevasan
President
Malaysian Bar
3 March 2009
Now. Sultan and Raja, please decide. Otherwise, just stop talking and giving speech.
Monday, March 02, 2009
Desperate Move from BN in Perak
We have witnessed all the silly things happened in Perak. It's all because the move by BN perak to take over the PR government in such unprofessional way. Perhaps, the only major mistake from BN perak is that they forget to kidnapp the speaker.
See some of the silly things did by BN Perak:
- Closing the state building on 3rd March. Yes, they can do this since the officials in the state building probably fear that they will lose their job.
- Asking the police and MACC to investigate the speaker. I am not too sure whether these are allowed. As you know, we all have learned about the doctrine of separation of powers in our history books.
- Applying for a declaration in the Ipoh High Court that the suspensions are invalid. Suddenly, the court is become so powerful that they can decide everythings in Malaysia.
"Jika keputusan yang dibuat oleh Speaker boleh dianggap sebagai satu jenayah, apa akan jadi jika Speaker Dewan Rakyat menggantung ahli pembangkang kerana apa-apa sebab? Dan ini kerap berlaku. Apakah ahli pembangkang akan lapor kepada polis? Jika boleh maka bolehlah kita anggap bahawa polis berkuasa keatas Speaker Dewan."
from Che Det
See some of the silly things did by BN Perak:
- Closing the state building on 3rd March. Yes, they can do this since the officials in the state building probably fear that they will lose their job.
- Asking the police and MACC to investigate the speaker. I am not too sure whether these are allowed. As you know, we all have learned about the doctrine of separation of powers in our history books.
- Applying for a declaration in the Ipoh High Court that the suspensions are invalid. Suddenly, the court is become so powerful that they can decide everythings in Malaysia.
"Jika keputusan yang dibuat oleh Speaker boleh dianggap sebagai satu jenayah, apa akan jadi jika Speaker Dewan Rakyat menggantung ahli pembangkang kerana apa-apa sebab? Dan ini kerap berlaku. Apakah ahli pembangkang akan lapor kepada polis? Jika boleh maka bolehlah kita anggap bahawa polis berkuasa keatas Speaker Dewan."
from Che Det